Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

HLSC 495: Seminar in Health Science: Writing Literature Reviews

Resources for Fox's Seminar in Health Science

What is a Literature Review?

Good scholarship involves:

  • Connecting ideas, theories, experience
  • Applying method/methodology to different areas
  • Creating new synthesis or insight
  • Re-examining existing knowledge

An essential means toward this end is the literature review. 

You may conduct a literature review in order to: 

  • Update current personal knowledge
  • Evaluate current practices
  • Develop and update guidelines for practice
  • Develop work-related policies
  • Develop a theory or conceptual framework
  • Make a case for further research

What makes a good literature review?

  • Gathers from many sources
  • Identifies key sources, issues, theories, concepts, & ideas
  • Discusses main questions, problems, & debates
  • Uses terminology accurately
  • Is well written
  • Contains accurate referencing

How do I do a literature review?

Steps for the literature review:

  1. Select a review topic (focus! manageable!)
  2. Searching the literature
  3. Gather, read and analyzing the literature
  4. Write the review
  5. References

Step One: Selecting a topic:

  • Is the topic interesting to you? Is there enough data?
  • Start narrow and focused topic;  broaden if necessary
  • Form a research question from your topic. 

Step Two: Searching the Literature:

  • Search relevant databases - check Subject Guides for help
  • Keep a record of the keywords and methods used in searching (for describing how the search was conducted)
  • Keywords: remember variations in spelling and synonyms
    • paediatric/pediatric
    • pressure ulcers/pressure sores
  • Use the limits/filters provided
  • Use existing literature reviews and systematic reviews
    • These are already a good overview of the research and will usually identify key or seminal works on a topic
    • Use their references to discover more sources - search the title in MuskieScholar or ask a librarian to help.
  • Be sure articles are published in a time frame appropriate to your topic

Step Three: Gather, read and analyzing the literature:

Analyze and synthesize the literature:

  • Scan the article summary or abstract
  • Group articles by type of source (primary, secondary)
  • Read and summarize. Pay attention to the:
    • Title, author, purpose, methodology, findings, outcomes
  • Cite your source
Primary source reading questions Secondary source reading questions
  • Title:
  • Author and year:
  • Journal (full reference):
  • Purpose of study:
  • Type of study:
  • Setting:
  • Data collection method:
  • Major findings:
  • Recommendations:
  • Key thoughts/comments, e.g. strengths/weakness:

Print a checklist

  • Title:
  • Author and year:
  • journal (full reference):
  • Review questions/purpose:
  • Key definitions:
  • Review boundaries:
  • Appraisal criteria:
  • Synthesis of studies:
  • Summary/conclusions:
  • Key thoughts/comments, e.g. strengths/weakness:

Print a checklist

Step Four: Writing the Review:

  • Work out a structure
    • Make an outline
    • Cluster and compare
  • Avoid long and confusing words jargon
  • Use short sentences
  • Use accurate spelling and grammar
  • Consists generally of introduction, body and conclusion
The Introduction The Main Body The Conclusion


  • Purpose of review
  • Overview of the problem
  • Outline key search terms
  • Describe limits, boundaries or inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • Comment about amount of literature found


  • Presents and discusses findings:
    • Divide the literature into themes or categories
    • Present literature chronologically
    • Draw links between works that build on each other
  • Personal opinions about quality only!


  • Conclude with summary of the findings
  • Expose gaps in knowledge and places for potential continued research
  • Recommendations or implications for practice, education and research



  • Use your own words
  • Highlight and compare results from key sources
  • Point out inconsistencies and contradictions


  • Misrepresent research findings
  • Be sloppy with citations
  • Forget to give credit to the words, ideas, and research of others

Step 5: Reference List:

Keep accurate references from the beginning to avoid having to hunt for missing citation information later on and to save time in general.

Using  a citation manager like Zotero can make this process easier.

Literature Maps

It may be helpful to you to create a literature map - a visual representation that identifies the connections between sources and how they build on each other. For example, consider this literature concept map.